
December 27, 2008
Consumer protection common theme in 2008
When it comes to consumer issues, my goal in this column is to educate,
protect, and occasionally, entertain.
Over the past year, I emphasized how important it is to have a lawyer's input
in a purchase or sale transaction as early as possible in the process, and how
lawyers may wind up recommending against a deal if it is not in the client's
best interest.
In May, I wrote about a homebuyer who got stuck with the seller's unpaid
final water bill when her title insurer refused to reimburse her. Shortly after
the column appeared, the title insurer announced that it had changed its policy
and would now be covering unpaid final utility bills.
In a city like Toronto, where many people live in close proximity to their
neighbours in condominiums or attached houses, noise continues to be an issue
for many residents. Two columns dealt with this issue, and a third was devoted
to the problem of second-hand cigarette smoke in multi-unit rental and
condominium units.
Three columns dealt with environmental issues related to home ownership.
Leaks from fuel oil tanks and the problem of asbestos discovered during a home
inspection were the kind of horror stories that attracted reader attention.
Regular readers will be aware that I am not overly fond of litigation as a
way to resolve property disputes. The process is expensive, time-consuming,
aggravating and risky: sometimes even the "good guys" lose.
This year I wrote about a number of cases involving home ownership where
nobody except the lawyers came out ahead.
The importance of obtaining a building permit was highlighted in a B.C. case
involving a pirate ship tree fort, which had to be demolished for lack of a
permit.
Mortgage and title fraud are always popular topics when they appear in this
space. Stories of people losing ownership of their homes to fraudsters always
generate a considerable amount of reaction, along the lines of "it could happen
to me." Related to the fraud theme, I wrote about the problems of counterfeit
cheques and bogus powers of attorney being used to steal the title to someone's
home.
Disclosure of property defects is a recurring theme in my columns. Whenever I
write about the dangers of Seller Property Information Statements (SPIS), I can
always be assured of considerable reader reaction – some of it supportive and
some of it hostile.
This year, my columns on SPIS litigation convinced at least one large Toronto
real estate brokerage to stop using the forms.
Cottage ownership inevitably provides considerable grist for the mill. This
year, I wrote about how registered road access is critical to cottage ownership,
how lakeside lots can appear to "grow" when water levels recede and how shared
cottage ownership can give rise to painful family feuds.
In 2008, I continued my ongoing crusade on the issue of the importance of
land surveys to real estate transactions, and how risky it is to buy – or sell –
a property without one.
After all, what good is buying an expensive piece of land with a house on it
if you don't know where the boundaries are, how big the lot is, and where the
house is on the lot?
If you missed any of these columns, they are online at
thestar.com/comment/
columnists/94630 and at
aaron.ca.
For me personally, the highlight of the year was my appointment by Small
Business and Entrepreneurship Minister Harinder Takhar to the board of directors
of Tarion Warranty Corp. earlier this month. My letter of appointment asked me
to ensure that the interests of Ontario's new homebuyers are well represented on
the board, and I hope to carry out the Minister's wishes at Tarion as I have
done for more than eight years in the Star.
Bob Aaron is a Toronto real estate lawyer and an appointed director of
the Tarion Warranty Corporation. He can be reached by email
at bob@aaron.ca, phone 416-364-9366 or
fax 416-364-3818. Visit the column archives at
http://aaron.ca/columns/toronto-star-index.htm
for articles on this and other topics.
|